top of page

How Did We End Up In This Political Environment?

Updated: Oct 20, 2020

We are currently on a trajectory towards destruction; the way the “news media” have ultimately decided that they have no need for journalistic integrity and have chosen to continue to bury legit stories, assist certain politicians and create outright false reports have created a political environment on the edge of chaos.

So, I was thinking about the state the country is in, and yeah, as corny as that sounds – I think we can all say at this point that we haven’t witnessed anything quite like this before. And really, we all are apart of this in some way. So, what exactly led us here – what drove these politicians to abandon the founding principles, embrace a new form of authoritarianism and deliberately jeopardize the integrity of the US election process by introducing procedures that could result in election fraud and a contested election? Why have they used every unethical tactic in an attempt to nullify the 2016 election? Well, I think it’s for the sole reason that they are engaged in widespread corruption, and they are on the ropes with everything about to come out.

If we go back to the Obama administration, we have three big scandals that sort of spiraled out of control once they lost control of the government. We are going to take a look at Uranium One with Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton, the Ukraine - Burisma scandal (you have to throw in the China story along with the illegal payments from Moscow in regards to Hunter and Joe Biden) and then we will finish up with the Iran Deal.

Uranium One

As prosecutors were investigating the Russian Interference Scandal in 2016, which we recently found out is a concocted story, created with the sole purpose of drawing attention away from Hilary Clinton's Email Scandal. As you may have heard, John Brennan's handwritten notes indicate that President Obama and current Presidential Candidate Joe Biden sat in a meeting and were briefed on the plan beforehand.

Anyway, I am getting off-topic; at this time, federal prosecutors are simultaneously conducting an investigation into the sale of a Uranium Company.

Interestingly and somewhat surprisingly, in my opinion, Jeff Sessions is the one who directed the prosecutors to look into the deal. Since then, multiple times, as you may remember, President Trump touted this as “The Real Russia Story.” As it turns out, that may be true – although the ties between Hunter and the Russians might also pan out to be significant.

The Hill reported that Russian officials engaged in a “racketeering scheme” to further its energy goals in the U.S. And an FBI informant recently told congressional committees that Russia paid millions to a U.S. lobbying firm in an effort to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to make sure the deal was successful.

So, what did the informant reveal? Douglas Campbell, the FBI informant, alleged that Moscow paid millions of dollars to a lobbying firm to help Bill Clinton’s charities in order to influence Hillary Clinton, who was then former President Barack Obama’s secretary of state. Campbell made the claims in a 10-page statement given to the Senate Judiciary Committee, House Intelligence Committee, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Campbell said Russian nuclear officials “told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton’s Global Initiative.”

In all fairness Hillary Clinton should get an entire post dedicated to her scandals as she was considerably busy. Her corrupt dealings didn't begin with Uranium One Deal, and all of the cash coming into the Clinton Global Initiative from foreign entities, the 30,000 missing emails, and that whole “situation,” should be researched separately. It seems to get worse than that however, to top it off, she tried to draw America's attention away from all of her own scandals by setting up her political opponent as a Russian Asset. That last one may be the thread pulled that undoes everything however…we shall see – AG William Barr came out on the 11th and declared no charges for the unmasking of Americans…so who knows.

Hunter/Joe Biden

There is a lot more information coming out about this, but lets go over some of the basics.

In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on February 21st when Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych abdicated by fleeing the country. Less than two months later, over the span of only 28 days, significant events involving the Bidens unfolded. On April16,2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.

This morning on October 14th the FBI got their hands on one of Hunter Biden's old laptops, and some interesting information came out, besides the gnarly selfies the dude took. I’ll just read through a section of that – “Hunter Biden discussed leveraging his connection to his father in a bid to boost his pay from a Ukrainian natural-gas company, according to an e-mail he sent around the time he joined the firm’s corporate board.

In a lengthy memo to his then-business partner, Devon Archer, who already sat on the Burisma board, Biden repeatedly mentioned “my guy” while apparently referring to then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Under President Barack Obama, the elder Biden was the point person for US policy toward Ukraine, and he held a press conference there with Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk on April 22, 2014.

Hunter Biden’s e-mail to Archer is dated a little more than a week earlier.

“The announcement of my guys [sic] upcoming travels should be characterized as part of our advice and thinking- but what he will say and do is out of our hands,” Hunter Biden wrote on April 13, 2014.

The e-mail to Archer contained 22 bullet points and bore the subject line “Tmrw.”

In No. 22, Hunter Biden told Archer, “Buy a cell phone from a 7/11 or CVS tmrw and ill do the same.”

Following the bullet points, Hunter Biden wrote, “This could be the break we have been waiting for if they really are smart enough to understand our long term value. If they are looking to just use us until the storm passes then we risked far too much for far too little.

“Finally, we need to have a plan on how we develop a corporate entity or LLP that allows us to draw on funds generated here to free us from existing (under-producing current commitments) and to build our own investment and expansion strategy. Maintaining the status quo is not an option,” he added.

So we are clear…Biden personally met with an executive on the board on behalf of Hunter.

And despite warnings regarding the sketchy deal, Obama knew what was going on, and did not act. It appears Biden knowingly leveraged his position to assist his son, and that’s being conservative with speculation. As we also know that once shit started to hit the fan, Biden threatened to withhold federal aid from Ukraine unless they fired a certain prosecutor…for a little background, let's check out an article from the federalist.

“While the whistleblower complaint is based on hearsay, we do know that Joe Biden, while serving as vice president, pressured the Ukrainian government to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son’s company. Hunter Biden joined the board of Ukrainian national gas company Burisma in 2014 while his father was managing the United States’ Ukraine policy and despite zero personal experience in the field. At the time Hunter Biden joined its board, Burisma was embroiled in allegations of corruption, allegations serious enough that Ukraine’s prosecutor general launched an investigation into the company.

Joe Biden was so proud of his role in the prosecutor’s removal from investigating the company paying his son $50,000 per month merely to serve on its board that he actually bragged about it in a 2018 speech at an event for the publication Foreign Affairs. In this speech, Biden boasts his threat to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loans from Ukraine if they did not agree to fire the prosecutor who happened to be investigating the company giving his son a cushy sinecure.

The prosecutor was fired, and the investigation was dropped six months later. While the investigation was just reopened last year, it has been a slow-moving process that has turned up little. At the time Biden pushed for the firing of Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor general, Shokin had plans to question Hunter Biden.”

According to the joint report released by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee with the Senate Finance Committee, Rosemont Seneca, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Yelena Baturina in 2014 while his father, Joe Biden, was vice president. The firm was also co-founded with former Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson Christopher Heinz, which received the money while Kerry was serving as the head of the State Department.

Other items in the Senate’s long-anticipated report detailing the Biden family’s conflicts of interest include accusations that Hunter Biden paid Eastern European hookers who might have been trafficked.

Hunter Biden, the committees wrote, initiated some transactions that were Russian- and Ukrainian-linked to what “appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”

The Senate’s conclusions from an investigation launched in 2017, long before Joe Biden would eventually make an entrance into the crowded Democratic presidential race come now just 41 days until the November election and features a wide array of potentially criminal allegations exposing a far deeper level of corruption in the people working with the Biden family than previously known.

In China, a series of businessmen working with Hunter Biden to establish a private equity firm investing Chinese capital in major American projects were also shown to possess deep ties within the Chinese Communist Party. The same Chinese business leaders also reportedly opened up a line of credit, allowing Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s brother James Biden, and James’ wife Sara to go on a more than $100,000 shopping spree that included extravagant items such as airplane tickets and high-tech products from Apple.

Alright, so far, we have covered a few scandals related to Secretary of State Clinton, Hunter, and Joe Biden, and although as President Of The United States, he should be held accountable for the corruption that individuals within his administration partook in, besides merely being aware of what was happening and essentially allowing it to continue – assumedly because as a collective – Obama saw benefits from them as well, he also wasn’t unscathed when it came to scandals.

The Iran Deal

At the time, the Iran Deal was both openly praised by the media on the left – as usual – but a majority of people believed the Iran Deal was terrible and had serious implications for the nation as a whole.

I was reading an article from 2015, and there are seven main points that have been called into question.

U.S. Nuclear Inspectors Are Banned From Inspecting Iran’s Nuclear Sites

Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal Lifts Economic Sanctions that Could Boost Iran’s Economy with $150 Billion in Revenue.

The Obama Administration Admits That ‘We Should Expect’ Iran Will Spend Some of the $150

Billion in Revenues Obama’s Deal Gives Them On Their Military and Possibly Terrorism.

In the same interview with Wolf Blitzer, Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice conceded the following: “Yes, it is real, it is possible, and, in fact, we should expect that some portion of that money would go to the Iranian military and could potentially be used for the kinds of bad behavior that we have seen in the region up until now.”

On the Very Week Obama Brokered His Iran Nuclear Deal, Large Crowds Across Iran Could Be Heard Chanting “Death to America”—And Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Declared ‘Death to America’ Just Months Ago

As even the Huffington Post noted under a headline titled, “DEATH TO AMERICA’ JUST LAST WEEK”: “Hatred towards the United States remains a basic tenet of Iran’s ruling system, on display just last week during an annual protest day that saw large crowds across Iran chanting ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel.’”

Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal Does Not Require Iran to Release Any American Prisoners

Obama’s proposed deal with Iran does not require the Iranians to release American prisoners, and at the time, 3 Americans were held hostage by Iran.

Obama’s Deal Allows Russia and China to Supply Iran with Weapons

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confirmed on Tuesday that “weapons supplies will be possible” under the new deal. As the International Business Times reports, “Russia and China will continue to make weapons deals with Iran under U.N. procedures.”

77 Percent of Americans Oppose Obama’s Lifting of Sanctions Against Iran

The thing is the Obama administration finally admitted something its critics had long suspected: The entire $1.7 billion tribute paid to Iran was tendered in cash — not just the initial $400 million infamously shipped to the Iranians in a cargo plane — at the same moment four American hostages were released.

The U.S. government has traced some of the $1.7 billion released to Iran by the Obama administration to Iranian-backed terrorists in the two years since the cash was transferred.

According to knowledgeable sources, Iran has used the funds to pay its main proxy, the Lebanon-based terrorist group Hezbollah, along with the Quds Force, Iran’s main foreign intelligence and covert action arm and element of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

“Then, Iran went on a terror spree, funded by the money from the deal and created hell in Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Iraq. The missiles fired last night at us, and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administration.” The Hill

But why would they go through this particular method to pay Iran – 1.7 billion in cash? More worth examining is why the transaction took the bizarre form that it did. To cut to the chase, I believe it was to camouflage — unsuccessfully — the commission of felony law violations. “National Review”

To this day, Iran remains on our government’s list of state sponsors of terrorism. Clinton’s state-of-emergency declaration has been annually renewed ever since. Let that sink in: Notwithstanding Obama’s often shocking appeasement of Tehran, he has been renewing the state of emergency since 2009 — most recently, just five months ago. Indeed, it is worth noting what the Obama State Department’s latest report on “State Sponsors of Terrorism” has to say about Iran. This is from the first paragraph:

Designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism in 1984, Iran continued its terrorist-related activity in 2015, including support for [Hezbollah], Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza, and various groups in Iraq and throughout the Middle East. In 2015, Iran increased its assistance to Iraqi Shia terrorist groups[.] . . . Iran used the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) to implement foreign policy goals, provide cover for intelligence operations, and create instability in the Middle East. The IRGC-QF is Iran’s primary mechanism for cultivating and supporting terrorists abroad. – “National Review”

With all of the information that is coming out, I think its fair to say that they never expected Hillary Clinton to lose in 2016 – which would have given them ample insulation from outside eyes, enabling them to cover their tracks – unfortunately for them and fortunately for us that didn’t happen. Leading up to the 2016 election, I was not political in nature – I was like most people worrying about other things and then quite a few “facts” didn’t line up, and I essentially started to fact check the news I was reading – that changed my opinion on a lot of different matters – and what lead to this – I had to ask myself a question – what is the direct cause of all of the chaos happening within the country right now.

There is no reason why the big tech companies, corporations, and the democrat party have begun to censor literally any opinion that deviates from what the pundits on MSM tell us – unless there is something they don’t want us to see – that simple truth has pushed the average citizen to search and crave truth – one saying we hear a lot these days is “we won’t go back to how things were” they are right about that – truth is the only way forward – and we as the people won’t settle for propaganda.



bottom of page